factory tio2 powder rutile titanium dioxide factory
As suppliers of titanium dioxide, we recognize the significance of maintaining consistent quality and supplying our customers with products that meet their specific requirements
cl 77891 titanium dioxide supplier. Our commitment to excellence extends beyond simply providing the raw material; we also offer technical support and guidance to help our customers achieve optimal results in their applications.
↑ Revenir plus haut en :a et b (en) W. J. O'Brien, « A Study of Lithopone [archive] », sur pubs.acs.org, J. Phys. Chem., (DOI 10.1021/j150155a002, consulté le ), p. 113–144
Titanium dioxide, known for its exceptional whitening and brightening properties, has been increasingly utilized as a pigment in concrete to enhance its aesthetic appeal. Not only does it lend a brilliant white color, but it also possesses superior UV resistance, making the concrete more durable and less prone to fading over time. This is particularly beneficial for outdoor structures exposed to harsh sunlight.
One of the key advantages of TiO2 R605 lies in its multi-purpose nature
On November 23, 2022, the General Court of the European Union reversed the conclusion that titanium dioxide was carcinogenic and released a statement (1,2):
“First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.”
As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.”
“First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.”
As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.”